Authority, evidence, and operating consequence across borders.
Source-backed reporting and analysis connected to the companies, capabilities, authorities, and operating domains it affects.
The U.S. Consolidated Screening List combines selected Commerce, State, and Treasury lists for cross-agency screening. OFAC's Sanctions List Service is the direct delivery and search environment for OFAC's SDN and non-SDN data, custom datasets, and list-change archives.
EAR Part 758 describes Electronic Export Information filed through the Automated Export System as a statement to the U.S. government about an export transaction, including item and authority fields when required. A filed or accepted EEI record needs to reconcile to the actual shipment and license basis; the filing itself does not grant export authority.
OFAC's August 28, 2026 action names one individual with two program tags and a link to Bank Melli Iran, plus a separately named trading company under a different tag. A list update needs two identity and transaction dispositions; shared release date, geography, or headline cannot merge the records or supply an unstated ownership finding.
ComplyAdvantage says one payment case can present alerts involving parties, reference text, and bank identifiers in a joint analyst view. A release or rejection remains defensible only when every consequential risk is tied to its message field, source profile, evidence, reviewer disposition, and payment-level decision.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions describes watchlist coverage spanning sanctions, politically exposed persons, adverse media, enforcement actions, and registration data. The same page also states that named services are not consumer reports and may not be used for covered eligibility purposes, making dataset, purpose, jurisdiction, and decision authority part of every screening receipt.
Facctum presents customer screening and payment screening as distinct capabilities alongside continuous watchlist updates. A standing relationship review and a time-sensitive payment decision may share identity data, but they require different populations, messages, clocks, evidence, authorities, and retained outcomes.
SAP says Global Trade Services supports sanctioned-party screening across sales, finance, human resources, procurement, and distribution, with blocked documents collected in work lists. The operational question is whether every work-list entry preserves its originating business function, document identity, version, state, and later change without collapsing unlike records into one generic case.
Castellum.AI describes sanctions and politically exposed person screening across many issuer lists, languages, aliases, and enriched identifiers. A potential match still needs a reproducible record of the screened subject, list record, field transformations, score, analyst reasoning, and applicable legal review.
Hurricane Commerce presents its Global Trade Ecosystem as an integrated, modular Delivered Duty Paid service that can retain a customer's transport, payment, clearance, IOSS, broker, and other providers. Each selected service still needs a named responsibility, handoff, evidence state, exception route, and execution receipt for every consignment.
Avalara presents tariff classification, landed-cost calculation, and trade-restrictions management within its cross-border offering. A restriction result is only defensible when the exact product, destination, parties, use, rule source, effective version, exception, and shipment decision remain reconstructable.
LSEG presents World-Check data for sanctions, politically exposed persons, regulatory and law-enforcement lists, adverse media, and related screening uses. A shared screening environment can organize those signals, but an adverse-media match, a watchlist record, and a legal restriction have different sources, meanings, review tests, and transaction consequences.
Descartes says its denied-parties product can screen transaction parties against government lists in real time or in batch. A candidate match still needs identity, list, ownership, transaction, license, and escalation review before a hold or release decision.
Automated preparation can turn shipment data into a declaration draft while leaving classification, valuation, admissibility, filer authority, submission, and customs response separately accountable.
One customs platform can coordinate declarations, tariff data, and denied-party checks without making a completed filing proof that the goods were correctly classified or every party was cleared.
The map organizes regimes, measures, lists, guidance, court rulings, and legal-act links for quick access. Its own disclaimer says the information is not a basis for decisions with legal implications and that only acts published in the EU Official Journal are authentic and produce legal effects.
OFAC administers multiple sanctions programs that can be comprehensive or selective. A country label, list hit, or program-page link is a starting point for scoped review—not a universal statement about every transaction.
